I would go to Innisfree …
[Inspired by WB Yeats’s The Lake Isle of Innisfree. It raises a haunting question: Pourquoi des mondes — Why worlds?]
I would go to Innisfree where the dream ambles
In a sleep that is in the soul of tranquillity;
Never would the birds screech on avocado green,
Soft verdancy spread in imagination’s valley.
But then should I not grow curious of other things
And climb the thoughtful hill looking up the bustling city?
Sure there’s worthwhileness in the noise seeking silence,
In the midst of death the arrival of immortality.
Hence now let me take a dexterous quantum leap
That in a dice throw shall dismiss all uncertainty;
My God shall then go for shopping to the town bazaar
And buy petite madeleines for himself and for me.
13 December 2025
Some Notes
The Lake Isle of Innisfree
I will arise and go now, and go to Innisfree,
And a small cabin build there, of clay and wattles made;
Nine bean-rows will I have there, a hive for the honey-bee,
And live alone in the bee-loud glade.
And I shall have some peace there, for peace comes dropping slow,
Dropping from the veils of the morning to where the cricket sings;
There midnight’s all a glimmer, and noon a purple glow,
And evening full of the linnet’s wings.
I will arise and go now, for always night and day
I hear lake water lapping with low sounds by the shore;
While I stand on the roadway, or on the pavements grey,
I hear it in the deep heart’s core.
I must say this is absolutely beautiful. Perfect in thought, perfect in rhythm, a perfect picture in words. What was the brush he had used to create this wonder? I would love to be in that Innisfree of dream where reigns tranquility in the inner sleep. But should I not add to it civilisation too? There is the tranquil and there is the dynamic, and they both can be together, both this and that. The static oneness and dynamic power belong to meaningful life of truth and joy and beauty and both must be present in the integrality of being and nature. (RYD)
One theme in The Lake Isle of Innisfree is nature versus civilisation. What we value in nature is often the exact opposite of what civilisation brings. Also, civilisation sometimes destroys the peace that nature provides. Another theme may be simplicity versus materialism. [Internet]
“Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are part of nature and therefore part of the mystery that we are trying to solve.”
— Max Planck, (1932), Where is Science Going? The Universe in the light of Modern Physics.

Leave a reply to RY Deshpande Cancel reply